Hospitals Snub the Florida Constitution With Impunity So Far
It is a part of the Florida Constitution.
It seemed fair to patients. With hospitals and doctors claiming the medical negligence problem was over blown, Florida Section 25, “Patients’ right to know about adverse medical incidents”, seemed like a common sense and fair law.
Read it. It is not very complicated.
But, since 2004, hospitals have been spending a great deal of time and money trying to circumvent, dodge and slip under the law. Sadly, hospitals have had reasonable success in throwing up legal roadblocks to the constitutional “requirement”.
What does Section 25 set forth? It seems pretty straightforward:
- Patients have the right to have access to any records made or received in the course of business by a health care facility or a health care provider that relate to any adverse medical incident.
- The health care provider is required to redact the personal information of any patient records released in complying with the law.
- A patient is intended to mean: an individual who has sought, is seeking, is undergoing, or has undergone care or treatment in a health care facility or by a health care provider.
- The law was intended to encompass: “adverse medical incident” means medical negligence, intentional misconduct, and any other act, neglect, or default of a health care facility or health care provider that caused or could have caused injury to or death of a patient.
A Coral Springs man, Harlan Ginsberg, has run headlong into a huge roadblock constructed by Northwest Medical Center, owned by HCA (Hospital Corporation of America), in Margate, Florida.
Mr. Ginsburg suffered a kidney stone attack. In the scheme of medical problems – not exactly a four alarm emergency. Certainly a medical condition that should allow health care providers to be deliberate and careful about their treatment, right?
Before leaving Northwest Medical, however, health care providers had been successful in cutting Mr. Ginsburg’s ureter (a tube that delivers urine to the bladder) and removing a completely healthy kidney, according to testimony of a physician.
Mr. Ginsburg was, understandably, upset. I would be if you removed a perfectly good, properly working organ from my body without even, well, asking me first.
He wanted to know how many other similar incidents occurred at the hospital and what the details were of those other incidents. He asked for the records under Section 25 of the constitution. Northwest Medical refused to provide him with the records. Later, probably after getting some good legal advice, the hospital relented and agreed to search its records for Mr. Ginsburg’s requested data. First, though, the hospital wanted $77,550 up front. I think we can look at $77,550 as a pretty big roadblock.
Section 25 of the Florida Constitution does not set forth anywhere that the hospital is permitted to charge to do a search that will produce the information. In fact, one might argue that if a law requires the provision of certain information, a corporation is intentionally violating the law by not maintaining record keeping in a way that allows compliance. But, that is one of the favored excuses from hospitals – “we do not maintain our records in a way that allows us to easily locate that information”.
Let’s think about that a minute. You run a hospital. I mean let’s pretend you are the CEO of a major hospital corporation. You are sitting in your office trying to determine the types of reports you want to regularly look at to accomplish your job responsibly. Wouldn’t a report that tells you how many medical incidents of negligence or mistake occurred in your hospital be one of the top five reports you would want to see? So, how can that data not be readily available to anyone?
How long will health care facilities and malpractice insurance companies be permitted to simply ignore or to dodge a part of the Florida Constitution? When will our lawmakers start requiring corporate compliance? When will someone stand up for individual citizens rights?
So far, citizens are not seeing any standing up from the executive branch or the legislature.