Photo

Hopkins

Pride & Prejudice About Product Safety

Published by John Hopkins in Defective Design, Mass Torts, Product Defect

Suppose that when a product malfunctions it was acceptable for the manufacturer to pay “experts”, recognized and notable professionals; to write articles, opinion letters, and studies, that spoke of the product’s safety. Articles that dispelled any notion that the product was really what was causing the problem.

Suppose that each of these “experts” was paid for their literary contributions, but did not disclose the payment.

Does not happen? Experienced, reputable “experts” would never agree to such a charade?

Unfortunately, it happens all the time.

I have been dealing with experts for many years and have often heard the trap of, “well, she teaches at ___________ School, she must know what she is talking about” or “he did clinical research at _______________ institution, he is certainly an expert”. These are constant traps people fall into. Where an expert teaches or was educated is a very small part of what does or does not make them an expert.

Experts are human. Experts can be influenced by money; by self interest, and by a really good “snow job” from a manufacturer.

This topic has once again raised its ugly head through discoveries made about the drug, Avandia. The Mayo Clinic did a retrospective study, in which they determined that many “experts” forgot to disclose financial ties they had with the manufacturer, GlaxoSmithKline.

Avandia is suspected of causing fluid retention, congestive heart failure, and heart attacks in diabetic patients.

It seems a good time for the pharmaceutical and medical device industry to adopt strict guidelines relating to disclosures of possibly prejudicing financial or other interests, which “experts” may have in connection with products or drugs.

If the industry will not do it voluntarily, perhaps it is overdue for the Food & Drug Administration to compel them.

Post to Twitter

Tags: , , , , , , ,

2 Responses to “Pride & Prejudice About Product Safety”

  1. Morena Says:

    Hello. I’d a lot entertaining looking at the post. It’s the shifting one. You understand how exactly to publish in which audience may totally enter the storyplot. Fantastic writeup you’ve.

  2. asdjekjkljad Says:

    Excellent goods from you, man. I have understand your stuff previous to and you’re just extremely magnificent. I actually like what you’ve acquired here, really like what you’re saying and the way in which you say it. You make it entertaining and you still take care of to keep it sensible. I cant wait to read much more from you. This is really a great web site.

Leave a Reply

  • Subscribe to SearcyLaw Blog
  • Searcy Blog RSS Feed
  • Follow SearcyTalk on Twitter
  • Related Posts Widget for Blogs by LinkWithin