Photo

Brenda Fulmer

Levaquin and Serious Tendon Ruptures

Published by Brenda Fulmer in Defective Design, Mass Torts, Product Defect

Levaquin (also known as levofloxacin) is a popular antibiotic that has been used for years for the treatment of upper respiratory infections, urinary tract infections, prostatitis, and bacterial infections.  It is part of a class of drugs known as fluoroquinolones, which were first marketed in the United States in 1997.  The fluoroquinolone class of drugs also includes the widely-prescribed antibiotics Cipro, Floxin, and Noroxin.  There have also been some notable fluoroquinolones that have been withdrawn from the market due to safety concerns, including Trovan (liver failure); Omniflox (low blood sugar; kidney failure, and anemia); Raxar and Zagam (prolonged QT syndrome); and Tequin (severe blood sugar reactions).

For several years, there have been rising concerns about adverse events associated with use of fluoroquniolones, especially Levaquin.  According to documents filed in the Levaquin litigation, being coordinated in the United States District Court in Minnesota, the Japanese company (Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.) that developed both Levaquin and Floxin knew prior to approval of Levaquin for sales in the United Sates that the drug was likely to cause Achilles tendon ruptures . This risk was well documented in the early years after introduction as it was marketed throughout Europe and began to cause harm to patients.

The warning label for Levaquin has included mention of the possibility of tendon ruptures in the past, but such labels were obscure and never adequately warned patients or prescribing physicians of the magnitude of the risk or the fact that Levaquin was more toxic than other, similarly effective drugs.  Other than placing a warning in December of 2001, based on postmarketing surveillance reports in the PDR, indicating that this risk may be increased in patients receiving concomitant corticosteroids, especially in the elderly, the manufacturer did not provide any special label precautions. The manufacturer fell far short in their warnings, regarding the higher risks faced by older patients or those concomitantly taking steroids.

This is most unfortunate because deleterious effects of fluoroquinolones on tendons have been well documented since the 1980s .

Finally, in 2008, after more than 1,000 reports of serious tendon injuries and ruptures to the FDA, a Black Box warning (the highest level of warning) appeared on the label confirming that patients taking Levaquin are at greater risk for suffering a ruptured Achilles tendon.   Unfortunately, the label still fails to alert physicians and patients that Levaquin is more toxic than other similar drugs .

Levaquin is particularly risky for patients who are over the age of 60 and taking corticosteroids at the same time as Levaquin.  Studies conducted by the manufacturer  indicated that Levaquin was more toxic than Cipro; for example the study that Ortho McNeil completed in 2001, one that Johnson & Johnson completed in 2006 and another By Johnson & Johnson completed in 1993. Unfortunately, none of the studies conducted by these manufacturers were published in any noted journals . Undoubtedly, if this information were known to physicians in the Untied States, prescribers would have evaluated the risk differently and chosen one of a number of other antibiotics for treatment of their patients. As a result, doctors might have avoided subjecting their patients to the unnecessary pain and suffering associated with an Achilles tendon rupture and a host of other adverse events.

Beginning in 2002, Johnson & Johnson sponsored a study that showed that Levaquin may also be risky for juveniles ranging between age 6 months and 16 years . In 2007, investigators published the results of that study in the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Journal, and they found that the incidence of one or more of four predefined musculoskeletal disorders identified in non-blind, prospective evaluations (i.e., arthralgia, arthritis, tendinopathy, gait abnormality), was statistically greater in levofloxacin-treated compared with non-fluoroquinolone treated children.

Levaquin triggers cell death which causes tendons to become weakened and often rupture.  Most patients suffer ruptures of their Achilles tendon since this is the tendon in the body that suffers the most trauma with everyday, weight bearing activities, although the rupture of other tendons has certainly been noted in patients who have taken Levaquin.  The rupture of an Achilles tendon is particularly painful injury that requires extensive physical therapy and mobilization of the leg.  Unfortunately, older patients may never fully recover from a tendon rupture.

Our firm is investigating cases on behalf of injured victims resulting from these types of serious injuries.

Post to Twitter

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

5 Responses to “Levaquin and Serious Tendon Ruptures”

  1. dontloseyourhair Says:

    Hi there, really enjoying your style – good to have you in the blogosphere – you aren’t just talkin to yourself!

  2. Sabine Stanley Says:

    My husband was given 500 ml of 750mg Levaquin on June 1 in an ER, they forgot to add the saline for dilution and ran it straight into mainline IV. He became ill immediately, but was already ill and trusting of the doctors, who continued him for 7 more days with the tablet version of Levaquin. 3 weeks later he was given 8 days worth of Cipro for another UTI, and again had strange side effects. He was sent to the hospital Nov 17 with what ended up being kidney failure at 40% function loss (with tests showing continuing function loss now) and also some type of autoimmune disorder that is causing his body to attack the protein in his kidneys which is causing the failure, along with severe anemia. He unfortunately has lung cancer on top of all of this, but we are not sure of treatment possiblities, surgery is out, chemo may shut down kidneys due to their deterioration. Have others reported these side effects to you? I have read about some similar reactions on line. Please contact us if you think this may help to get these drugs off the market and if we can join in a class action lawsuit. We are just beginning this journey and will have a meeting this coming week with the renal specialist, hopefully he will listen to me as to the damage caused by these drugs. Any official documentation supporting my theory would be great if you can get it to me to help support my pleas. Thank you, Sabine Stanley

  3. Colombia Says:

    Thanks for the great info. I hope you

  4. Carman Slevin Says:

    I’ve check out your other website posts also and I consider you’ve got great suggestions. Hold it up!

  5. Arcizo Says:

    Loving the info on this web site , you have done great job on the posts .

Leave a Reply

  • Subscribe to SearcyLaw Blog
  • Searcy Blog RSS Feed
  • Follow SearcyTalk on Twitter
  • Related Posts Widget for Blogs by LinkWithin